Close Menu
What The FinanceWhat The Finance
    What's Hot

    Whistleblowers Unmask Schwab’s Toxic WEF Secrets

    April 25, 2025

    Capital One-Discover Merger Reshaping the Credit Card Industry

    April 24, 2025

    Michael Saylor’s Strategy New $286 Million Bitcoin Purchase

    April 15, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    X (Twitter) Facebook YouTube
    What The FinanceWhat The Finance
    Donate
    • NewsWire

      Capital One-Discover Merger Reshaping the Credit Card Industry

      April 24, 2025

      Michael Saylor’s Strategy New $286 Million Bitcoin Purchase

      April 15, 2025

      Breaking Down the U.S. Budget

      February 14, 2025

      The Financial Impact of Mizotakis Resigning in Greece

      February 1, 2025

      Incoming US President Shocks with $TRUMP Memecoin Launch

      January 18, 2025
    • Bitcoin

      The Rise of State-Level Strategic Bitcoin Reserves

      February 19, 2025

      How Oklahoma is Embracing Bitcoin with Legislation

      January 15, 2025

      Without Bitcoin: A Grim Vision of the Financial Future

      January 6, 2025

      Rumble Video Creators to Be Paid in Bitcoin

      December 24, 2024

      French Politician Advocates for EU Bitcoin Reserve

      December 17, 2024
    • Crypto

      The DAO Governance Battle Between Corporations & Blockchain Rebels

      October 25, 2024

      Altcoin Season Coming to an End? BTC Dominance & Institutions

      September 27, 2024

      Is Tether a $118 Billion Dollar Scandal Waiting to Happen?

      September 18, 2024

      Uncovering North Korean IT Workers in DeFi Scam

      August 16, 2024

      Navigating the Crypto Market: Avoiding Liquidation & Bull Traps

      July 24, 2024
    • Stocks

      NASDAQ 100 Welcomes Bitcoin Through MicroStrategy

      December 14, 2024

      Master the Time Value of Money Financial Concept

      December 9, 2024

      MicroStrategy Convertible Debt Expansion Sparks Stock Surge

      November 21, 2024

      Financial Ratios Guide to Measuring Business Performance

      November 18, 2024

      The Highest Paid CEOs of 2024

      October 1, 2024
    • Global Economy

      Whistleblowers Unmask Schwab’s Toxic WEF Secrets

      April 25, 2025

      Tariff Tensions Drive Market Volatility

      April 9, 2025

      Red in Name Only: Labour’s War on the UK Working Class

      March 18, 2025

      AI, Robotics & the Future of Cheap Production

      January 20, 2025

      Can Milei Inflation Gamble Hurt Argentina’s Future?

      January 13, 2025
    • TradFi
      • Investment Ideas
      • Forex
      • Commodities
      • Best Deals
    • Markets
      • Cryptocurrency Prices
      • Fear & Greed Index
      • World Market Indices
      • US Stock Market
      • Live Forex Rates
      • S&P 500
      • Gold
    What The FinanceWhat The Finance
    Home»Satoshi»Legal Labyrinth: Craig Wright’s Testimony on Day 6 of COPA Trial
    Day 6 COPA v Wright Trial
    Satoshi

    Legal Labyrinth: Craig Wright’s Testimony on Day 6 of COPA Trial

    February 12, 2024No Comments13 Mins Read189 Views
    Share
    Twitter Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Telegram

    As the legal battle between COPA and Craig Wright unfolds in the London High Court, the intricacies of the case become increasingly apparent. The trial, which has garnered significant attention in the cryptocurrency community, delves deep into Wright’s claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. With each session, the courtroom becomes a platform for dissecting complex narratives surrounding the origins of Bitcoin, Wright’s professional history, and the legitimacy of his claims.

    Read the series: Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 3 | Day 4 | Day 5 | 1st Week Summary

    Morning Session

    Rolls Building

    The sixth day of the COPA vs. Wright trial in the London High Court was marked by detailed cross-examinations and probing into Craig Wright’s professional background and claims. The session, led by COPA barrister Jonathan Hough KC, focused on scrutinizing Wright’s career history, his involvement in various IT projects, and the authenticity of his claims about his role in the development of digital cash systems.

    1. Examination of Professional History and Credentials

    The session opened with Hough questioning Wright about his career trajectory, specifically his role at the Australian Stock Exchange in 1997-98. Wright clarified that his job description, as outlined in a CV from BDO, was primarily focused on C++ coding, contrary to what was stated in the marketing document. This line of questioning aimed to establish the depth of Wright’s technical expertise, particularly in the areas relevant to the development of digital currency systems.

    2. Lasseters and Digital Cash Systems

    The discussion then moved to Wright’s involvement with Lasseters, an online casino. Hough presented various documents, including Wright’s witness statement against McCormack and a 2002 document listing tasks performed by DeMorgan for Lasseters. The key point of contention was whether Wright conceptualized digital cash systems for Lasseters. Wright maintained that he designed a token-based login system for the casino, hinting at his early involvement in digital cash concepts, although he admitted that the term “digital cash” was not explicitly mentioned in his LinkedIn profile, CV, or the McCormack statement.

    3. DeMorgan’s Role and Wright’s IT Security Work

    Further examination involved Wright’s work with DeMorgan and his role at BDO from 2004-09. Wright clarified his responsibilities, including managing IT and digital forensics services, and stressed that his roles were not limited to straightforward IT security work. He highlighted his involvement in high-level coding projects, including token systems and logging, which played a part in his development of a hashchain-based system.

    4. The Allegations of Plagiarism

    One of the session’s most contentious points was the allegation of plagiarism in Wright’s LLM thesis. Hough presented articles and documents showing similarities between Wright’s thesis and the work of author Pearson. Wright acknowledged the similarities but explained them as referenced footnotes and errors in editing and formatting. This segment aimed to challenge the credibility of Wright’s academic work and integrity.

    5. Development of Bitcoin and Digital Currency Systems

    The latter part of the session delved into Wright’s claims regarding the development of Bitcoin and other digital currency systems. Wright discussed his pseudonymous development of Bitcoin, sharing drafts with a small group of people, and his discussions on digital currency systems with various colleagues and contacts. He clarified that Bitcoin was not the end goal but a part of a larger project, MetaNet, and his patent activities.

    6. Examination of Wright’s Multifaceted Career and Productivity

    Hough highlighted Wright’s extensive involvement in various projects and qualifications, including blogging, writing books and papers, and pursuing multiple degrees simultaneously. The aim was to juxtapose Wright’s claimed contributions to digital currency systems with his documented activities during the relevant period.

    The Afternoon Grilling

    The afternoon session of Day 6 in the COPA vs Wright trial in the London High Court focused on Craig Wright’s interactions and discussions regarding digital cash systems, specifically his claims about Bitcoin’s origin and development. The session, led by COPA barrister Jonathan Hough KC, was a rigorous interrogation of Wright’s narrative and the authenticity of his claims.

    7. Wright’s Interaction with Microsoft and the Bitcoin Whitepaper

    The session commenced with Hough questioning Wright about his job application and interviews with Microsoft in 2008, a crucial period when Satoshi Nakamoto was gearing up to release the Bitcoin whitepaper. Wright acknowledged his interactions with Microsoft but denied pitching a digital cash or logging system to them. Hough pointed out the lack of evidence in Wright’s emails about showing the Bitcoin whitepaper to Microsoft, challenging Wright’s previous statements about potentially leading Microsoft to own Bitcoin.

    8. Handwritten Notes and References to Bitcoin

    Hough presented a handwritten note from Wright, referencing frustrations with “Fucking Visual Studio!” and discussing micropayments over ad-based models. Wright claimed these notes were from 2011-2012, a statement he adjusted from his initial claim of 2008. This led to a discussion about Gareth Williams, a person referenced in the notes who died in 2010, casting doubt on the timeline provided by Wright.

    9. Wright’s Claims of Early Bitcoin Development and Dissemination

    The barrister scrutinized Wright’s account of the early stages of Bitcoin, including the genesis block mining and the system’s initial challenges. Wright described dealing with Microsoft’s Patch Tuesday updates, elaborating on the technical aspects of managing these updates. This detail was challenged, with Hough suggesting Wright was fabricating details to lend credibility to his story. Many people have gone to Twitter since to discredit Wright’s claims as fiction.

    10. The Alleged Dissemination of Bitcoin Whitepaper Drafts

    Wright’s claims about sharing early drafts of the Bitcoin whitepaper were closely examined. He mentioned sharing drafts with various individuals, including Don Lynam, Gareth Williams, and unnamed people at Newcastle University. However, Hough highlighted the lack of public acknowledgement or evidence from these individuals about receiving drafts from Wright.

    11. Examination of Wright’s Allegations and Claims About Bitcoin’s Development

    The session delved into Wright’s allegations against Martti Malmi and others, accusing them of deviating from his vision of Bitcoin and being responsible for illicit activities. Hough pointed out the lack of documentary support for these allegations. The barrister also challenged Wright’s narrative about the genesis block and the private keys associated with it, focusing on the technical and logistical inconsistencies in Wright’s account.

    12. Wright’s Relationship with Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Definition

    Wright’s definition of Bitcoin and his reluctance to label it as a cryptocurrency was another focal point. He expressed that he had been lax with the term “cryptocurrency” but later became strict about not using it. Hough presented evidence contradicting Wright’s claims, showing Satoshi Nakamoto referring to Bitcoin as a cryptocurrency.

    Community Reaction

    Craig Wright is casually undermining his entire bitcoin creation story in real time as, one by one, the people who helped him 'design' it all deny ever having met him.

    Scenes. https://t.co/fZ7YtFkVgd

    — Mark "Not Forged…Just Altered" Hunter (@Twentynothing00) February 12, 2024

    Dr Con Kolivas, a software engineer known for his development of Bitcoin’s mining software, cgminer, has expressed a skeptical opinion regarding Craig Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious creator of Bitcoin. His skepticism isn’t just rooted in disbelief; it’s reinforced by Wright’s own words and actions during legal proceedings.

    Dr Kolivas has clearly stated that he never believed Craig Wright had any chance of being the true identity behind Satoshi Nakamoto. This skepticism is common among many in the cryptocurrency community, where Wright’s claims have been met with a mix of skepticism and scrutiny.

    What seems to have solidified Dr. Kolivas’ opinion is Wright’s behavior in court. Describing Wright’s testimony as “confused ranting, raving, misdirection, confabulation, diversion, distraction, and countless other tactics,” Dr. Kolivas implies that Wright’s conduct during the trial was not only unconvincing but also indicative of a deliberate attempt to obfuscate and mislead. This portrayal paints a picture of Wright as someone who is far from the clear-minded, visionary creator that many would expect of Satoshi.

    Dr. Kolivas’ final remark, suggesting that Wright might have invented perjury, is clearly hyperbolic and sarcastic. However, it underscores a deeper sentiment of frustration and disillusionment that many observers feel regarding Wright’s claims and behavior. This statement, while humorous, also reflects a broader disappointment within the crypto community – a sentiment of being let down by someone who has positioned himself as a pivotal figure in the history of cryptocurrency.

    I've never thought CSW had a hope in hell of being Satoshi and inventing bitcoin.
    But listening to CSW's confused ranting, raving, misdirection, confabulation, diversion, distraction, and countless other tactics…
    I have to think that maybe…
    just maybe…
    He invented perjury.

    — Dr. Con Kolivas (@ckpooldev) February 12, 2024

    Susie Violet Ward, Bitcoin Journalist for Forbes and Head of Mining & Sustainability at Bitcoin Policy UK, notes in a recent Tweet that Wright admitted to forgeries during the trial. This admission is significant, as it directly impacts the credibility of his claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

    In a surprising twist, Wright challenged his own expert witness during cross-examination. This unusual move suggests a breakdown in the consistency of Wright’s legal defense. Typically, an expert witness is brought in to bolster one’s case, and challenging them can be seen as a sign of either a strategic misstep or a deeper inconsistency in the narrative being presented.

    Ward’s comment that Wright declared “I AM Satoshi” during cross-examination highlights the dramatic nature of the trial. Given the context of the admission of forgeries and the challenging of his own expert witness, this declaration might be perceived less as a confident assertion of truth and more as a desperate attempt to assert authority in a situation where his credibility is being actively questioned.

    Arthur van Pelt, a prominent Bitcoiner on Twitter known for meticulously documenting the case, shared insights on Day 6 of the trial, led by Justice Mellor. Van Pelt reports that Mellor began the day by addressing emails from Christen Ager-Hanssen and Steve Shadders, both expressing dissatisfaction with statements Craig Wright made about them in court. These emails, one seeking permission to send a witness statement and the other already attached with one, were forwarded to both counsels for further action.

    Van Pelt observes that hardcore Craig Wright fans are seemingly unsettled by these developments. Additionally, he describes a notable moment where Wright, appearing stressed and agitated, attempted to rant about COPA members’ tweets on the Bitcoin price, leading to firm intervention by both Mellor and Hough. This observation paints a picture of increasing tension and drama in the courtroom, capturing the attention of followers and participants alike.

    Norbert is ready. 🍿 https://t.co/yKlSyDLuYI

    — Artie Fan Belt 🔥 ∞/21M ⚡ (@Arthur_van_Pelt) February 12, 2024

    Norbert, covering the trial of COPA v Wright live, provided a candid and somewhat critical summary of Day 6, focusing on the identity issues at play. He described the day as the most entertaining yet, marked by Craig Wright’s increasing agitation under pressure. The judge, Mellor, had to frequently intervene due to Wright’s challenging demeanor.

    The day included Wright going off-topic, bringing up past scandalous allegations against Martti Malmi, which Norbert chose not to repeat. Wright gave unexpected credit to Adam Back for Bitcoin’s value increase and casually mentioned Greg Maxwell and Martti Malmi’s pseudonyms in the Bitcoin community.

    Craig's testimony today regarding Dustin Trammell is a good example of what kind of shameless liar he is.

    Craig testified in a previous case that he sent Dustin some bitcoin code before it was released.

    In this case, Dustin has a witness statement that that isn't true.

    — phil toddman (@apeachnamedphil) February 12, 2024

    Jason Deane observed that Craig Wright appeared unusually uncomfortable, especially when questioned about his claims of collaborating with various academic figures. These individuals, through sworn statements, denied any association with Wright, and most had retired before his time at their respective universities, making such collaborations impossible.

    Additionally, Wright attempted to discredit Adam Back’s involvement in early Bitcoin development, labeling him as a shill for the “Bitcoin Ponzi scheme,” before being checked by Jonathan Hough KC. Deane suggests that Wright is trying to rewrite Bitcoin’s history without evidence or witnesses, displaying a sense of defeat unlike his usual confident demeanor. Wright now claims a poor memory for “people, names, and dates” and suffers from Prosopagnosia, contradicting his previous statements, adding to the complexity of his testimony and character in the trial.

    Hodlonaut, the Norwegian Bitcoiner who successfully contested a lawsuit filed by Craig Wright, shared an intriguing opinion on the anticipated testimony of Stefan Matthews in the ongoing Wright trial. Hodlonaut speculates that Matthews faces a challenging task in aligning his upcoming testimony with the conflicting statements made by Wright, as well as with his own previous testimony from Hodlonaut’s trial in Oslo.

    This situation is described as a “tangled web,” a complex and potentially contradictory narrative that Matthews must navigate. Hodlonaut, confident in the justice system’s ability to unravel these complexities, wryly wishes Matthews luck, indicating a belief in the inevitable arrival of “karma” for those involved in the case.

    Stephan Matthews has not commented on Twitter since December 11th 2023.

    Two best bits today from the CSW trial:
    1. Patch Tuesday
    CW has said a number of times previously that the reason for the gap between block 0 (the Genesis block) on 3 Jan 2009 and block 1 on 9 Jan 2009 was due to Microsoft 'Patch Tuesday'. This, however, occurred on Tuesday 13…

    — Dr Tufty Sylvestris (@tuftythecat) February 12, 2024

    The BSV Camp

    369BSV shared an alternative perspective on the latest events in the trial, highlighting Craig Wright’s intriguing courtroom tactics. The day began with Wright teasing a significant revelation, instructed by Lord Grabiner KC, to be disclosed later. The session ended with Wright admitting he lacks “cryptographic” proof for the genesis block, implying there might be other forms of evidence.

    According to 369bsv, despite being grilled in court, Wright appeared to leave with a smug grin, suggesting confidence in his strategy. 369bsv is captivated by the case, viewing Wright’s admission not as a setback, but potentially a clever manoeuvre, and eagerly anticipates the next day’s proceedings.

    Implications for the Trial

    As Day 6 of the COPA vs. Wright trial concluded, the courtroom narrative left observers with more questions than answers. The morning session’s examination of Wright’s professional background raised doubts about the depth of his technical expertise and involvement in early digital cash concepts. The afternoon session further complicated the narrative, probing Wright’s interactions with Microsoft and his claims regarding the development of Bitcoin.

    While Wright maintained his stance as the creator of Bitcoin, the evidence and his responses under cross-examination painted a complex and, at times, contradictory picture. The trial’s outcome remains uncertain, but what’s clear is its potential impact on the cryptocurrency community and the enduring mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto’s true identity. As the legal proceedings continue, the world watches closely, anticipating the next chapter in this unfolding crypto saga.

    Author Profile

    Lucy Walker
    Lucy Walker
    Lucy Walker covers finance, health and beauty since 2014. She has been writing for various online publications.
    Latest entries
    • April 25, 2025Global EconomicsWhistleblowers Unmask Schwab’s Toxic WEF Secrets
    • April 9, 2025Global EconomicsTariff Tensions Drive Market Volatility
    • March 18, 2025Global EconomicsRed in Name Only: Labour’s War on the UK Working Class
    • March 7, 2025SatoshiCraig Wright Banned from UK Courts with Civil Restraint Order
    1
    Share. Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Reddit Facebook
    Previous ArticleBittensor TAO Crypto – The Dawn of Decentralized AI
    Next Article MicroStrategy’s Strategic Bet on Bitcoin in $3.5B Profit

    Related Posts

    Craig Wright Banned from UK Courts with Civil Restraint Order

    March 7, 2025150 Views

    Trillion $ Bitcoin Lawsuit Dismissed as Court Issues Written Verdict

    December 20, 2024Updated:December 20, 2024

    Craig Wright Convicted to 1 Year in Prison for Contempt

    December 19, 2024Updated:December 19, 2024
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply

    Stock Ticker
    • Loading stock data...

    Whistleblowers Unmask Schwab’s Toxic WEF Secrets

    April 25, 2025

    Capital One-Discover Merger Reshaping the Credit Card Industry

    April 24, 2025

    Michael Saylor’s Strategy New $286 Million Bitcoin Purchase

    April 15, 2025

    Tariff Tensions Drive Market Volatility

    April 9, 2025
    Categories
    • Best Deals
    • Bitcoin
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
    • Global Economics
    • Investment Ideas
    • NewsWire
    • Satoshi
    • Stock Market
    Recent Comments
    • Bitcoin Grandad on The Aftermath: Craig Wright, BSV & nChain in Crisis
    • Peter Williamson on SUI: A Rising Force in the Blockchain World
    • Peter Williamson on Robotics Revolution 2024: A Guide to 16 Industry Leaders
    Also Check Out

    Craig Wright Banned from UK Courts with Civil Restraint Order

    March 7, 2025

    The Rise of State-Level Strategic Bitcoin Reserves

    February 19, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest sports news from SportsSite about soccer, football and tennis.

    Your source for financial news. This is not financial advice. Our opinions are independent of any financial organizations.

    2007 - 2023 | What The Finance Magazine

    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn TikTok
    Top Insights

    Whistleblowers Unmask Schwab’s Toxic WEF Secrets

    April 25, 2025

    Tariff Tensions Drive Market Volatility

    April 9, 2025

    Red in Name Only: Labour’s War on the UK Working Class

    March 18, 2025
    Categories
    • Best Deals
    • Bitcoin
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
    • Global Economics
    • Investment Ideas
    • NewsWire
    • Satoshi
    • Stock Market
    Pages
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Get In Touch
    • Markets
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donate
    • Trending Articles

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok