Close Menu
What The FinanceWhat The Finance
    What's Hot

    Whistleblowers Unmask Schwab’s Toxic WEF Secrets

    April 25, 2025

    Capital One-Discover Merger Reshaping the Credit Card Industry

    April 24, 2025

    Michael Saylor’s Strategy New $286 Million Bitcoin Purchase

    April 15, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    X (Twitter) Facebook YouTube
    What The FinanceWhat The Finance
    Donate
    • NewsWire

      Capital One-Discover Merger Reshaping the Credit Card Industry

      April 24, 2025

      Michael Saylor’s Strategy New $286 Million Bitcoin Purchase

      April 15, 2025

      Breaking Down the U.S. Budget

      February 14, 2025

      The Financial Impact of Mizotakis Resigning in Greece

      February 1, 2025

      Incoming US President Shocks with $TRUMP Memecoin Launch

      January 18, 2025
    • Bitcoin

      The Rise of State-Level Strategic Bitcoin Reserves

      February 19, 2025

      How Oklahoma is Embracing Bitcoin with Legislation

      January 15, 2025

      Without Bitcoin: A Grim Vision of the Financial Future

      January 6, 2025

      Rumble Video Creators to Be Paid in Bitcoin

      December 24, 2024

      French Politician Advocates for EU Bitcoin Reserve

      December 17, 2024
    • Crypto

      The DAO Governance Battle Between Corporations & Blockchain Rebels

      October 25, 2024

      Altcoin Season Coming to an End? BTC Dominance & Institutions

      September 27, 2024

      Is Tether a $118 Billion Dollar Scandal Waiting to Happen?

      September 18, 2024

      Uncovering North Korean IT Workers in DeFi Scam

      August 16, 2024

      Navigating the Crypto Market: Avoiding Liquidation & Bull Traps

      July 24, 2024
    • Stocks

      NASDAQ 100 Welcomes Bitcoin Through MicroStrategy

      December 14, 2024

      Master the Time Value of Money Financial Concept

      December 9, 2024

      MicroStrategy Convertible Debt Expansion Sparks Stock Surge

      November 21, 2024

      Financial Ratios Guide to Measuring Business Performance

      November 18, 2024

      The Highest Paid CEOs of 2024

      October 1, 2024
    • Global Economy

      Whistleblowers Unmask Schwab’s Toxic WEF Secrets

      April 25, 2025

      Tariff Tensions Drive Market Volatility

      April 9, 2025

      Red in Name Only: Labour’s War on the UK Working Class

      March 18, 2025

      AI, Robotics & the Future of Cheap Production

      January 20, 2025

      Can Milei Inflation Gamble Hurt Argentina’s Future?

      January 13, 2025
    • TradFi
      • Investment Ideas
      • Forex
      • Commodities
      • Best Deals
    • Markets
      • Cryptocurrency Prices
      • Fear & Greed Index
      • World Market Indices
      • US Stock Market
      • Live Forex Rates
      • S&P 500
      • Gold
    What The FinanceWhat The Finance
    Home»Satoshi»Decoding the Forgeries: Scrutinizing Craig Wright’s Documents
    Craig Wright Forgeries
    Satoshi

    Decoding the Forgeries: Scrutinizing Craig Wright’s Documents

    January 25, 2024No Comments6 Mins Read223 Views
    Share
    Twitter Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Telegram

    This is an analysis overview of the “Schedule of Dr. Wright’s Further Forged Documents” in the case of Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) vs. Dr Craig Steven Wright. This document is a pivotal piece in the legal proceedings, where COPA challenges Dr Wright’s assertion of being Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic creator of Bitcoin.

    Overview of the Legal Context

    The document is part of a legal battle in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts of England & Wales, Intellectual Property List (ChD). It serves as an extension to the PTR judgment dated 20 December 2023 and focuses on 20 documents from the Additional Documents, which COPA alleges are forgeries by Dr. Wright. These documents are central to Dr. Wright’s claim to the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto.

    Detailed Allegations of Forgery

    The schedule meticulously lists and analyzes each document, providing reasons and expert opinions to support the allegations of forgery. The primary accusation is that Dr. Wright either personally altered these documents or had them altered to substantiate his claim of being Satoshi Nakamoto.

    image 126

    LaTeX Files Analysis

    A significant portion of the document is dedicated to analyzing several LaTeX files, notably “main.tex” and “E-Cash-main.tex”. These files are claimed by Craig Wright to have been used in writing the Bitcoin White Paper.

    • Technical Discrepancies: The experts’ analysis points to various technical discrepancies in the documents. For instance, the font encoding and embedding in the alleged original Bitcoin White Paper are fundamentally incompatible with LaTeX, especially the version available in 2009.
    • Metadata and Editing History: The metadata suggests the recent creation and editing of these files. For example, the document “main.tex” was shown to have undergone over 211 edits between 19 November and 1 December 2023, which contradicts Dr. Wright’s claims about the document’s origin.
    image 127
    image 127 1

    The BDOPC.raw File

    1. BDOPC.raw originated from a computer last used in July 2007, but the content was later altered in September 2023 by adding, modifying, and deleting files.
    2. The manipulation of BDOPC.raw involved setting the computer clock to October 2007 to mask the editing artefacts, suggesting intentional backdating.
    3. Metadata from 2023 was replaced with that from 2007, particularly indicating modifications to a folder named “My Files” on 17 September 2023, which was later altered to appear as if it were from October 2007.
    4. The original BDOPC image ran on Windows XP, which did not support Transaction Log metadata. However, the .raw file contains such metadata, implying it was edited with a later version of Windows that recorded extensive revisions.
    5. Documents among the 97 New Reliance Documents, purported to back Dr Wright’s claim, were added in September 2023 from a different user account than the pre-existing files, with a unique Security ID (SID).
    6. Sessions of editing reflected by Object ID metadata on the BDOPC.raw file took place on 17, 18, and 19 September 2023, interspersed with sessions backdated to 31 October 2023.
    7. All Object IDs created in September 2023 matched the SID of the user account that performed the manipulations, referred to as the “Manipulation User.”
    8. Additionally, multiple iterations of the drive image were found on the same storage device, with two particular images, InfoDefoog.raw and Image.raw, being almost identical to BDOPC.raw but containing data relevant to the New Reliance Documents, suggesting a systematic alteration of data.

    These points collectively hint at deliberate attempts to forge documents to support Dr. Wright’s claim of being Satoshi Nakamoto, casting doubt on the authenticity of the evidence presented and raising questions about the veracity of his claims.

    A Competing Transaction or Block Model

    1. Nature of the Document: It discusses technical concepts that are similar to those addressed in the Bitcoin White Paper, including a time hash protocol, double-spending, and conflicting block transmissions.
    2. Allegation of Forgery: It is one of the 71 documents referred to as the New Reliance Documents, which have been inserted into the BDO Drive through a process that experts agree involves manipulation.
    3. Backdating Evidence: The document, an MS Word ‘.doc’ file, has metadata timestamps indicating it was created and modified in 2007, but it references MS Word version 11.9999, which wasn’t available until September 2007, suggesting anachronistic data entries.
    4. Metadata Discrepancies: The metadata implies it was authored by ‘Lynn Wright’ and was created with the aforementioned version of MS Word, which aligns with characteristics of other documents from Dr. Wright that have been deemed manipulations in COPA’s original Schedule of Forgeries.
    5. Source of the Document: The paper was sourced from BDOPC.raw and added by a user who is suggested to have been Dr Wright, referred to as the ‘Manipulation User’.
    6. Implications of Tampering: The alterations are purported to fabricate evidence supportive of Dr. Wright’s claim to be Nakamoto, which contradicts facts.
    7. Dr. Wright’s Emphasis on the Document: He has allegedly attached importance to this document, claiming it underpins the concepts developed in the Bitcoin White Paper.

    Inconsistencies and Inferences

    The document draws inferences about Dr. Wright’s knowledge and responsibility in the creation of these documents. It highlights several inconsistencies in his statements and actions:

    • Creation and Editing Timeline: The timeline of the creation and editing of these documents, as revealed by the metadata, strongly suggests they were recently created.
    • Technical Anachronisms: The use of modern LaTeX code and software packages in the documents, which were not available in 2009, further casts doubt on their authenticity.
    • Contradictory Statements: Dr. Wright’s statements about the origin and nature of these documents are contradicted by the technical evidence presented.

    Alleged Manipulation of Evidence

    The schedule accuses Dr. Wright of manipulating evidence to support his narrative. It points to his alleged failure to disclose these documents during the initial stages of the legal proceedings and suggests that this was part of a strategy to delay the trial.

    • Blaming Former Advisors: Dr. Wright is accused of falsely blaming his former advisors for the non-disclosure of these documents.
    • Strategic Creation of Documents: The timing and manner of the creation of these documents are suggested to be strategic, and aimed at influencing the legal proceedings.

    Expert Opinions and Technical Analysis

    The document extensively references various expert reports and witness statements. These include detailed technical analyses that challenge the authenticity of the documents presented by Dr. Wright. The experts’ consensus is that the documents in question exhibit signs of recent creation and contain technical elements that would not have been possible at the time of the original Bitcoin White Paper’s creation.

    The “Schedule of Dr. Wright’s Further Forged Documents” presents a comprehensive and technically substantiated argument against Dr. Wright’s claims. By combining detailed technical analysis, metadata examination, and expert testimonies, COPA aims to demonstrate that the documents central to Dr. Wright’s claim of being Satoshi Nakamoto are forgeries.

    This document is a crucial element in the ongoing legal dispute, shedding light on the complexities and technicalities involved in proving the authenticity of digital documents and the identity of individuals in the cryptographically anonymous world of Bitcoin.

    COPA alleges that Craig Wright fabricated numerous documents. In the upcoming Identity Issue trial, 20 out of 97 alleged forgeries will be examined. Following the trial’s conclusion, Justice Mellor is set to deliver a verdict on COPA’s fraud allegations against Wright.

    Author Profile

    Ahmed Dhaif
    Ahmed Dhaif
    Ex-community moderator of the Banano memecoin. I have since been involved with numerous cryptocurrencies, NFT projects and DeFi organizations. I write about crypto mainly.
    Latest entries
    • December 9, 2024Stock MarketMaster the Time Value of Money Financial Concept
    • November 18, 2024Stock MarketFinancial Ratios Guide to Measuring Business Performance
    • November 11, 2024NewsWireLabour’s UK Budget: A Fiscal Smirk of Contempt for Working People
    • October 25, 2024CryptoThe DAO Governance Battle Between Corporations & Blockchain Rebels
    1
    Share. Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Reddit Facebook
    Previous ArticleCraig Wright’s Non-Negotiable Bitcoin Settlement Offer
    Next Article The Controversial Rise & Fall of Financier Bruno Crastes

    Related Posts

    Craig Wright Banned from UK Courts with Civil Restraint Order

    March 7, 2025

    Trillion $ Bitcoin Lawsuit Dismissed as Court Issues Written Verdict

    December 20, 2024Updated:December 20, 2024

    Craig Wright Convicted to 1 Year in Prison for Contempt

    December 19, 2024Updated:December 19, 2024
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply

    Stock Ticker
    • Loading stock data...

    Whistleblowers Unmask Schwab’s Toxic WEF Secrets

    April 25, 2025

    Capital One-Discover Merger Reshaping the Credit Card Industry

    April 24, 2025

    Michael Saylor’s Strategy New $286 Million Bitcoin Purchase

    April 15, 2025

    Tariff Tensions Drive Market Volatility

    April 9, 2025
    Categories
    • Best Deals
    • Bitcoin
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
    • Global Economics
    • Investment Ideas
    • NewsWire
    • Satoshi
    • Stock Market
    Recent Comments
    • Bitcoin Grandad on The Aftermath: Craig Wright, BSV & nChain in Crisis
    • Peter Williamson on SUI: A Rising Force in the Blockchain World
    • Peter Williamson on Robotics Revolution 2024: A Guide to 16 Industry Leaders
    Also Check Out

    Craig Wright Banned from UK Courts with Civil Restraint Order

    March 7, 2025

    The Rise of State-Level Strategic Bitcoin Reserves

    February 19, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest sports news from SportsSite about soccer, football and tennis.

    Your source for financial news. This is not financial advice. Our opinions are independent of any financial organizations.

    2007 - 2023 | What The Finance Magazine

    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn TikTok
    Top Insights

    Whistleblowers Unmask Schwab’s Toxic WEF Secrets

    April 25, 2025

    Tariff Tensions Drive Market Volatility

    April 9, 2025

    Red in Name Only: Labour’s War on the UK Working Class

    March 18, 2025
    Categories
    • Best Deals
    • Bitcoin
    • Commodities
    • Crypto
    • Forex
    • Global Economics
    • Investment Ideas
    • NewsWire
    • Satoshi
    • Stock Market
    Pages
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Get In Touch
    • Markets
    • Privacy Policy
    • Donate
    • Trending Articles

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok